Six Years of Sexy Unsexy (probably NSFW?)

What’s scarier than U.S. politics?

Not this!

Welcome to the 2020 edition of my annual Best Sexy [Thing That Is Inherently Not Sexy] Halloween Costume Contest!

Every year since 2015, I remind you how ridiculous commercialism is by reviewing women’s Halloween costumes. This year is going to be the weirdest Halloween of our lifetimes, with the global COVID-19 pandemic and a particularly insane U.S. election coming up just three days later – but the show must continue in a timely manner. Here’s how it works.

I have no problem with celebrating Halloween, nor with women celebrating Halloween by wearing sexy costumes. Wear what you like. What I do have a problem with is the fact that our cultural expectations are such that we expect all women’s costumes to be sexy, and thus it is nearly impossible for women to find regular, not-sexy costumes to celebrate Halloween.

The result is that, in addition to perfectly sensible Sexy Cheerleader or Sexy Non-Copyright-Infringing Black Panther costumes, there are plenty of sexy costumes built from ideas that are definitely Not Sexy. And that’s what we celebrate here, every year in the weeks leading up to Halloween.

When you see a sexy costume of something that is inherently not sexy, comment here with a link to it, or send it to me on my Facebook or Twitter. I’ll keep a record of all the submissions and report them all here, a few at a time, in the days leading up to Halloween. On Halloween night, I’ll announce the winner, and the person who suggested the winning entry will win a prize!

To help you get ready for this year’s contest, here are the previous winners!

2015: Sexy Killer Whale

Black-and-white costume with a tail hanging from the back and a hoodie that looks like a killer whale head
Sexy Killer Whale – a woman in a short black-and-white fake fur dress with a thick forked black tail and a black hood with white eye spots

She might look cute, but she’ll eat you alive! Suggested by Jeremy Berg.

2016: Sexy Scrabble

A short white dress decorated like a Scrabble board (with colored ties), and thigh fringe with letters
Sexy Scrabble – a woman in a short fringed dress patterned like a Scrabble board with tiles hanging down as the fringe

You might think that a board game would be too abstract to make a sexy Halloween costume, but that would be a M-I-S-T-A-K-E for 13 points, plus a 50-point bonus for using all your letters. If you’re smart enough, she might let you play too! Suggested by Kelly Simms.

2017: Sexy Green Poo

Green poo-shaped costume from too many Sexy Black Whoppers
A woman with green high heels, white tights, and a green felt costume folded to look like literal poo

This bizarre costume is a reference to a distant memory, Burger King’s Halloween-themed Black Whopper, which apparently turned your black whoppers a bright shade of green. It’s kind of a shitty costume tbh. Suggested by Aimee Shoff.

2018: Sexy Marcel Duchamp Art Gallery Urinal

A very short dress decorated to look like a urinal - ceci n'est pas une Halloween costume
A woman in a hip-length white dress painted to look like a urinal with black spots symbolizing holes.

It’s a urinal, but it’s not just a urinal, it’s actually a tribute to the work of art Fountain by Belgian surrealist Marcel Duchamp. Is it art? Regardless, it’s a golden idea! Suggested by Christina Rawls.

2019: Sexy Mr. Rogers

Same sexy Mr. Rogers, but now with black stiletto heels and HAND PUPPETS of King Friday and Daniel the Lion
A woman in a tight red sweater with hand puppets of Daniel the Lion and King Friday XIII

In honor of the film A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, which premiered in October 2019. Don’t forget to take off the sweater to go to the Magical Land of Make-Believe! Suggested by Elliot Kresmer.

What amazing costumes will we get for the 2020 edition of Best Sexy [Thing That Is Inherently Not Sexy] Halloween Costume Contest? Suggest away!

Mapping Democracy: The U.S. House of Representatives

There’s a lot more to our democracy than just the President. On Wednesday, I showed you a map of current U.S. Senators, and explained how the clustering of similar states fools your eyes and brain into seeing our urban-rural divide as a divide between the coasts and the middle of the country.

Today, I map the U.S. House of Representatives. The map is below. As before, each hexagon shows one elected representative. I show all the representatives for a single state together, enclosed by a thicker yellow line; the number of representatives varies from one each (Alaska, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont) to fifty-three (California).

I also tried to keep the locations of districts within states roughly geographically accurate. For example, New York’s 26th District covers the city of Buffalo in Western New York, and so in the map it is second from the left in New York.

Red shows Republican representatives, blue shows Democratic representatives, and white shows a few vacant seats whose incumbents died or resigned in the second year of their terms. The single splotch of yellow is Michigan District 3, represented by Justin Amash, who switched to the Libertarian Party in April 2020 and became the first third-party representative in seventy years. Unfortunately for third parties everywhere, he is not running for re-election. Each district is labeled with the name of the person who represents it (and bite me for having the same last name and first initial, Adam Smith [D-WA9] and Adrian Smith [R-NE3]).

The map below is so compressed that the names are extremely hard to read, so if you’d like to see who represents where, click for a larger version.

Map of U.S. House representatives. Red hexagons show Republican senators, blue hexagons show Democratic senators, yellow shows Libertarian, and white shows vacant seats.

Click for a larger version.

What can we learn from this map?

House districts are designed to give equal representation to all Americans, so by definition and by design the House shows a more accurate picture of the state of American democracy. Each district is home to about 700,000 people (the 308.7 million people in the 2010 U.S. Census divided by the 435 available seats). The specific boundaries of the districts are set by state legislatures, sometimes with hilarious consequences, but that’s a post for another day.

The map makes it much clearer that the blue/red divide (the colors are still arbitrary) is driven not by state boundaries, nor by each state’s positions within the nation. Rather, the partisan divide is actually an urban/rural divide. It’s easy to see that in this map, where I have graffiti-circled and labeled the metro areas of Denver, Chicago, Houston, and Atlanta. Those areas tend to elect Democratic representatives, while the rural areas of their states tend to elect Republican representatives.

The same map as above, but with four metro areas circled.

Now that I’ve got these maps of the composition of the U.S. Senate and House today, I can use them to predict what the composition might be after next month’s elections. That’s coming next, along with an updated prediction for the 2020 Presidential Election.

Mapping Democracy: The U.S. Senate

It’s been fun using maps to track current polling for the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. But there’s a lot more to our democracy than just the President. Because each state’s electoral votes are equal to the number of senators plus representatives, it’s easy to go to from elected legislators to Presidential electoral votes. Or the other way around. And so it’s easy to turn a map of electoral votes into a map of Senators.

And so. The map below is organized roughly-geographically, and shows the Senators from each state by name. Roses Republican Senators are red, violets Democratic Senators are blue, and light bluie shows the two independent Senators, Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Angus King (I-ME), both of whom caucus with the Democratic Senators.

It’s hard to see the names in the regular-size map below, so click on it to see a larger version.

Map of U.S. Senators, two per state. Red hexagons show Republican senators, dark blue hexagons show Democratic senators, and light blue hexagons show independent senators who caucus with Democratic senators. Each hexagon is labeled with one of the Senators who represents that state. Click for a larger version.

Looking at Senators displayed on a map like this, with equal importance given to all states and thematic geography, shows how the rules of the Senate exacerbate the urban/rural differences that keep us divided.

Every state has both urban and rural areas, but states with similar urban/rural percentages tend to cluster together: more urban on the east coast, west coast, and the western side of the Great Lakes, and more rural everywhere else. That, combined with the traditional yet 1000% arbitrary red-and-blue color scheme results in a map with large stretches of red and large stretches of blue. Look how lonely Doug Jones (D-AL) and Susan Collins (R-ME) are as the sole members of their parties for miles around.

I’ll be using this map for many purposes in the future, starting with making predictions for the 2020 Senate election… soon. I need to look at the polls in a lot more data. That was a typo, I meant “look at the polls in a lot more detail,” but honestly “look at the polls in a lot more data” is way better. But first…

You can probably guess what’s coming on Friday, and why it’s 4.35 times more work.

Presidential election prediction 3: COVID-19 campaign edition

A microscope image of SARS-COV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19
One year ago, this virus only infected bats and pangolins.
Today, the President of the United States.

Well that was unexpected.

We got our October Surprise (TM) early this time. Just 25 hours into the month of October, at 1 AM ET on Friday, October 2nd, President Donald Trump announced on Twitter that he had tested positive for COVID-19.

Later the same day, he was reported to have started showing symptoms, although it is unclear when his symptoms began. By that night, he had been moved to Walter Reed Medical Center and placed on supplemental oxygen.

Today at 6:30 PM ET, Trump left Walter Reed Medical Center. I don’t think he’ll be back – not because he won’t need to go back, but rather because his medical staff is busy installing whatever is required to turn the White House into a hospital. If Trump’s condition worsens, the hospital will come to him.

And unfortunately, the typical trajectory of COVID-19 is for patients to improve for a few days and then get worse again. The up-and-down cycle continues until either the patient is healthy enough that they no longer need acute care, or they die. Obviously I hope for a quick, steady, and painless recovery for him and for everyone he may have infected – but I fear that is unlikely at best.

How this will affect the presidential election depends on how quickly Trump recovers, and how effectively his doctors can hide any relapses. We are seeing data only from the very first polls since Trump announced his diagnosis, and they seem to be heavily critical of Trump. For example, in a new Ipsos poll, 67 percent of registered voters agree with the statement, “If President Trump had taken coronavirus/COVID-19 more seriously, he probably would not have been infected with the coronavirus/COVID-19.” Considering how incredibly difficult it is to get 67 percent of people to agree on anything in today’s partisan environment, that’s a strong signal.

Similarly, polling data is starting to turn more strongly in favor of Biden, and that is reflected in the updated prediction map below. I realized that linking directly to the 270towin geographic map means that I can’t link to a larger version of the prediction map. So below is the prediction map, and if you’d like to try it for yourself, see the link below it.

As always, I try to report the data as clearly as I can. I care more about the truth than I care about what I think.

My predicted election results as of today, October 5, 2020

Make your own predictions using mine as a template at 270towin.com!

The final score prediction is the same: Biden 320, Trump 218. But some of the predicted confidence levels have changed:

  • Probably most importantly for determining the outcome: with Biden opening up a six-point aggregate polling lead there, I have switched Pennsylvania from “tilt Biden” to “lean Biden”
  • And similarly, I have changed both New Hampshire and Nebraska’s second congressional district to lean Biden
  • Perhaps most surprisingly, polling in Georgia is now basically a dead heat, so I have moved Georgia from “lean Trump” to “tilt Trump.”

Don’t be surprised if some of these states tilt back toward Trump now that the President is out of the hospital. But still, time is running out for Trump’s re-election chances – many people have already voted.

Including me – I dropped my ballot in the city lockbox on Saturday afternoon, and I got confirmation today that it has been received and counted. My voice has counted, and I hope yours will too. Vote!